A gateway pattern built for automated callers.
Use BTX when you want every expensive route to quote a live work price that agents and API clients can satisfy programmatically before execution.
BTX gives you two building blocks for AI-facing products: fresh, chain-bound work challenges for route admission, and wallet-backed post-quantum signing material for agents, services, and operators that want stronger long-term identity than legacy signatures provide.
These bundles line up the docs in the order an API team usually works: prototype the challenge route, bind identity, wire the control plane, and watch live conditions.
Start with the smallest useful loop: issue a challenge, solve it, and redeem it on the route you want to protect.
Layer BTX work on top of explicit caller identity so admission and stronger signing assumptions evolve together.
Once the challenge loop works, connect it to the broader RPC and wallet surfaces your service already operates.
Expose challenge cost and network health like any other production dependency so operators can tune protection without guessing.
These answers stay close to the current RPC and wallet docs: BTX complements existing auth, adds fresh-work pricing to expensive routes, and gives AI-native systems a post-quantum identity path.
No. BTX works best as a complement to the auth stack you already have. Keep identity, scopes, and policy where they are, then ask for BTX work only on routes where abuse, cost, or resource contention matters.
Open the relevant docUsually after normal request identification but before the costly action runs. The server issues a live challenge envelope, the caller solves it, and the service redeems the proof before it spends GPU time, model quota, or other scarce resources.
Open the relevant docBTX lets the same system talk about fresh work and stronger signing material in one stack. For teams already planning around post-quantum migration, that makes it easier to evaluate identity and admission together instead of as separate future projects.
Open the relevant docArchitecturally yes: keep the existing role, scope, and device-trust model, then add BTX as a route-level work requirement. That is the intended fit described on this page, not a claim that BTX ships a native OpenClaw integration today.
Open the relevant docStart with the service challenge guide, read the wallet model, and prototype an agent-safe route that requires both identity and work.